Closing arguments are now underway in Hunter Biden’s federal firearms trial in Delaware. The defense rested its case without calling the president’s son to testify. Hunter Biden’s attorney agreed to allow the judge to instruct the jury that they should not hold it against him that he did not take the stand. The prosecution concluded its rebuttal by recalling FBI agent Erika Jensen to the stand.
Hunter Biden faces charges of illegally purchasing and possessing a firearm while being addicted to drugs in 2018. The trial, which has garnered significant public attention, marks the first time in U.S. history that the child of a sitting president has faced such charges in court.
Last week, the defense began its case by calling Hunter Biden’s 30-year-old daughter, Naomi Biden, who testified about visiting her father at a Los Angeles rehab center in 2018, describing him as “looking great.” This testimony aimed to provide a personal perspective on Biden’s efforts to overcome his addiction.
Former federal prosecutor Andrew Cherkasky commented on the trial, stating that Biden’s lawyers have a tough road ahead, as he believes the Department of Justice has presented a strong case. This trial has been closely watched, not only because of Hunter Biden’s high-profile status but also due to the broader implications it may have for federal firearms laws and the handling of addiction-related offenses.
As the trial progresses, the judge is currently reviewing jury instructions, preparing for the final phase of the trial. The outcome remains uncertain, but the proceedings have already sparked discussions about legal accountability and the complexities of addiction within the context of federal law.
With the trial’s conclusion approaching, the focus now shifts to the jury’s deliberations and the potential impact of their verdict. The case continues to unfold under intense public scrutiny, reflecting the heightened interest in the legal challenges faced by the president’s son.
