California Governor Gavin Newsom is facing criticism following revelations that his office pays a professional photographer $200,000 a year to document his activities. The six-figure salary, funded by taxpayer dollars, goes to Charles Ommanney, a renowned photographer with an impressive portfolio that includes work for high-profile figures such as Mark Zuckerberg, former President George W. Bush, and former President Barack Obama.
Ommanney’s role involves capturing and curating photo opportunities for the state’s top executive, documenting both official events and more informal moments. Despite his notable credentials, the news that Ommanney is among the highest-paid employees in the administration—earning just $34,000 less than Governor Newsom himself—has sparked debate over the appropriateness of such an expense.
Critics argue that the allocation of $200,000 annually for a photographer, especially during a time of economic challenges and budget concerns in the state, is an unnecessary luxury. They question whether such funds could be better spent on more pressing needs within the state, particularly as California grapples with issues like housing, homelessness, and the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Supporters of the expenditure, however, contend that a well-documented visual record of the governor’s activities is important for transparency and public engagement. They argue that having a professional photographer ensures that the state’s communication efforts are polished and effective, particularly in a media-driven political landscape.
Governor Newsom’s office has yet to comment directly on the controversy, but the revelation has added fuel to ongoing debates about government spending and the priorities of the current administration. As the discussion continues, it remains to be seen whether there will be any changes or justifications made regarding the use of taxpayer dollars for such a high-profile role.
