The U.S. House Oversight Committee is intensifying its scrutiny of Denver, Colorado, over its sanctuary city status. Congressional leaders are demanding that Mayor Mike Johnston testify at an upcoming oversight hearing to address allegations that the city has failed to comply with federal immigration enforcement and violated U.S. immigration laws.
The investigation is part of a broader effort by Republican lawmakers to examine the impact of sanctuary city policies nationwide. These policies, which limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, are designed to foster trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement. Critics argue that such practices undermine federal immigration law, while proponents defend them as essential for public safety and community stability.
The committee’s focus on Denver follows a series of high-profile incidents involving undocumented immigrants in the city. Lawmakers cite concerns that Denver’s policies create a safe haven for individuals who pose risks to public safety. The city, however, has consistently maintained that its approach is legal and in line with the Constitution, emphasizing that it prioritizes protecting residents while upholding community trust.
Mayor Johnston has yet to confirm his attendance at the hearing but issued a statement defending Denver’s policies. He emphasizes the city’s commitment to supporting immigrant communities while ensuring public safety. Johnston also accuses Congress of politicizing immigration issues, stating, “We are a city built on inclusion, and we will not compromise the values that make Denver strong and united.”
The investigation comes amid growing tensions over immigration policy at the federal level. Republican lawmakers argue that sanctuary cities impede the enforcement of immigration laws, particularly in light of increased border crossings and the strain on federal resources. Democrats, on the other hand, highlight the humanitarian crises driving immigration and the need for comprehensive reform, which has remained elusive for decades.
Denver has long been at the center of debates over sanctuary city policies. The city first declared itself a sanctuary city in 2014, formally adopting policies that prohibit local law enforcement from holding individuals solely based on immigration detainers issued by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This stance has made Denver a target of criticism from federal immigration officials and conservative lawmakers.
Legal experts weigh in on the Oversight Committee’s investigation, noting that the Constitution grants states and localities significant discretion in determining how to allocate resources and enforce laws. They suggest that the outcome of this inquiry could set a precedent for the federal government’s ability to pressure cities with similar policies.
As the hearing approaches, immigrant advocacy groups in Denver are rallying in support of the city’s policies. Organizations such as the Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition argue that sanctuary city policies are vital for protecting vulnerable populations and ensuring that immigrants feel safe reporting crimes without fear of deportation.
The Oversight Committee’s investigation highlights the growing divide over immigration policy in the United States. As Denver faces increased scrutiny, the city’s response will likely influence the national conversation surrounding sanctuary cities and the role of local governments in federal immigration enforcement.
